An investigation of projectile motion using basic classroom experiments and mathematical concepts

Authors

  • Daniella Y. Gonzales Nueva Ecija University of Science and Technology, San Isidro, Nueva Ecija, Philippines
  • Mark Ren D. Villaflor Nueva Ecija University of Science and Technology, San Isidro, Nueva Ecija, Philippines
  • Arkin B. Batongbakal Nueva Ecija University of Science and Technology, San Isidro, Nueva Ecija, Philippines
  • Nica Denise P. Pablico Nueva Ecija University of Science and Technology, San Isidro, Nueva Ecija, Philippines
  • Titin Rahmiatin Rahim Muhammadiyah University of Kendari, Kendari, Sulawesi Tenggara, Indonesia
  • Usman Muhammadiyah University of Kendari, Kendari, Sulawesi Tenggara, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64171/JAES.6.4.41-46

Keywords:

Projectile motion, Launch angle, Horizontal range, Maximum height, Classroom experiment

Abstract

This study investigated projectile motion through simple classroom experiments and mathematical analysis to examine how closely experimental measurements of horizontal range, maximum height, and time of flight agree with theoretical predictions. Experimental trials launched a ping-pong ball at 30°, 45°, and 60° using a rubber-band launcher. Measurements (three trials per angle) recorded range, peak height, and flight time and were averaged for analysis. Theoretical values were computed with standard projectile equations and compared to experimental averages. Percentage errors were generally small (≤5.21%), showing close agreement between observations and model predictions. Results show the 45° launch produced the greatest horizontal range while the 60° launch produced the highest maximum height and longest time aloft, illustrating the independence of horizontal and vertical motion and the role of launch angle. Small discrepancies were attributed to air resistance, launcher variability, and measurement limitations. The study concludes that low-cost classroom experiments effectively reinforce mathematical and physical concepts of projectile motion and recommends more precise instruments and expanded trials for future work.

References

Chinaka TW. The effect of PhET simulation vs. phenomenon-based experiential learning on students’ integration of motion along two independent axes in projectile motion. Afr J Res Math Sci Technol Educ., 2021. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/18117295.2021.1969739

Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 6th ed. SAGE Publications, 2023. Available from: https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/asi/research-design/book270550

Hernandez-Sanchez L, et al. A computational and pedagogical framework for projectile motion using Python visualizations. arXiv, 2026. Available from: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2601.05769

Jamaludin J, Batlolona JR, Dulhaszim ABP. Building new understanding through experiments: Students' conceptual shifts on projectile motion. ResearchGate, 2025. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/397652881_Building_New_Understanding_Through_Experiments_Students'_Conceptual_Shifts_on_Projectile_Motion

Ling S, Sanny J, Moebs W. University Physics. Vol. 1. OpenStax, 2021. Available from: https://openstax.org/books/university-physics-volume-1/pages/4-3-projectile-motion

PhET Interactive Simulations. Projectile motion. University of Colorado Boulder, 2021. Available from: https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/projectile-motion

Urone PP, Hinrichs R. College Physics. 2nd ed. OpenStax, 2022. Available from: https://openstax.org/books/college-physics-2e/pages/3-4-projectile-motion

Yıldırım H. Averages in projectile motion with linear and quadratic drag. Am Math Mon. 2025. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00029890.2025.2533116.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-15

How to Cite

Gonzales, D. Y., Villaflor, M. R. D., Batongbakal, A. B., Pablico, N. D. P., Rahim, T. R., & Usman. (2026). An investigation of projectile motion using basic classroom experiments and mathematical concepts. Journal of Advanced Education and Sciences, 6(4), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.64171/JAES.6.4.41-46

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)