Policies and Guidelines
The Journal of Advanced Education and Sciences decides which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. When evaluating the submitted Works, editors should limit themselves to the intellectual content. Subjects such as race, gender, sexual orientation, supernatural virtue, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors. Editors can favor ignoring material that violates legal requirements regarding defamation, infringement of rights, and plagiarism. Editors are required to maintain the confidentiality of submissions until they are published. Publishing an article in a highly peer-reviewed multidisciplinary journal is an essential part of developing a logical and valuable information network. It is a direct indication of the level of work of the authors and also of the institutions that support them. The reviewed articles support and illustrate the methodology. Disagreement about the ethical standards of behavior that are expected of all parties involved in the publication act: author, journal publisher, reviewer, editor, and also society.
Peer Review and Publication Policy
The Journal of Advanced Education and Sciences employs a rigorous peer review system. All submitted manuscripts undergo a peer-review process before publication.
The journal uses the double-blind peer-review process, in which both reviewers and authors remain anonymous during the entire review process.
Every proposal submitted for publication is read by at least one editor for an initial review. The article complies with editorial guidelines and with a minimum quality level it is sent to two reviewers. Reviewers do not know the identity of the author as all identifying information is removed from the document prior to review.
Reviewers' comments to the editors are confidential and before passing on to the author are going to be created anonymously. supported the reviewers' comments, the Editorial Board makes a judgment on the satisfactoriness of the manuscript, and communicates to the authors the decision, together with referees' reports. whether or not important revisions are proposed, acceptance depends on whether the author will manage those satisfactorily.
Reporting Standards: Authors of original research reports should provide an accurate description of the work done as an objective discussion of its meaning. The underlying data must be correctly presented in the article. An article should have enough detail and references for others to copy the work. False or intentionally inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.
Data Access and Retention: Authors are also asked to provide the information in reference to a paper for editorial review, and will be prepared to produce public access to such data, if feasible, and should, in any event, be prepared to retain such data for an affordable time after publication.
Originality and Plagiarism: The authors should make sure that they need to be written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Plagiarism takes many forms, from publishing another‘s paper because of the author‘s own paper, to copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another‘s paper (without acknowledgment), to claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism all told its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.
Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication: An author shouldn't, generally, publish manuscripts describing essentially equivalent research in additional than one journal or primary publication. Submitting an equivalent manuscript to quite one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is intolerable. Generally, an author shouldn't submit for consideration in another journal a previously published paper.
Acknowledgment of Sources: Proper acknowledgment of the work of others should tend. Authors should cite publications that are significant in determining the character of the reported work. Information obtained privately, such as through conversation, correspondence, or discussion with a third party, cannot be used or transmitted without the written permission of the source. Information obtained within the course of confidential services, like refereeing manuscripts or grant applications, must not be used without the specific written permission of the author of the work involved in these services.
Authorship of the Paper: Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, implementation, or interpretation of the reported study; all who have made significant contributions should be included as co-authors; if there are others who have participated in certain content studies. Aspects of scientific research must be recognized or listed as contributors. The Corresponding Author must ensure that all eligible co-authors and non-inappropriate co-authors are included in the article, that all co-authors have viewed and approved the final version of the article, and accepted its submission for publication.
Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects: If the work involves chemicals, processes, or devices that pose unusual dangers with their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript. If the work involves the use of animals or humans, the author must ensure that the manuscript includes a press release stating that each procedure has been carried out in accordance with relevant laws and institutional guidelines approved by acceptable institutional committees for publication within the manuscript indicating that consent to conduct experiments on humans has been obtained of human subjects.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: All authors must disclose in their manuscript any financial or other conflicts of interest that could be construed to affect the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project must be disclosed.
Fundamental Errors in Published Works: If the author discovers/found a serious error or inaccuracy in their own published work, they must notify or mail the journal editor or publisher immediately and work with the editor to withdraw or correct the article. From a third party that a printed work contains a major error, it is a requirement of the author to quickly withdraw or correct the article, or to provide proof to the editor of the correction of the first article.
Editorial Board Duties
The Journal of Advanced Education and Sciences follows guidelines based on existing Elsevier policies and COPE Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
Publication Decisions: The editor of a peer-reviewed multidisciplinary journal (Journal of Advanced Education and Sciences) is in control of deciding that the articles submitted to the journal ought to be published. Confirmation of the study in question and its relevance to researchers and readers should make such decisions. The editor is additionally maneuvered by the policies of the journal editorial board and affected by such legal needs as shall then be in impact relating to libel, plagiarism, and infringement of copyright.
Fair Play: The editor of a peer-reviewed journal should not be partial to matters such as race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
Confidentiality: The editor and any editorial employees should not disclose any data of submitted manuscripts to anyone apart from the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, alternative editorial advisers, and also the publisher, as acceptable.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: Any unpublished material disclosed during a submitted manuscript should not be used in an editor's own research without written permission from the manuscript author. Any inside information or ideas gained through the peer review are often kept strictly confidential and will not be used in any way.
Personal Benefit The editor must refrain from considering manuscripts in which they create a competitive conflict of interest (i.e. asking a co-editor, co-editor, or other members of the editorial board to submit a review and appearance), collaboration, or other relationships or associations with authors, companies or (possibly) institutions related to writing. Publishers should require all contributors to disclose relevant competing interests and post corrections if competing interests are disclosed after publication. be considered, such as a retraction or an expression of disgust.
Open Access Policy
This journal provides open access to all of its content, based on the principle that the publication of research promotes a wider global exchange of knowledge; This access is associated with a larger readership and a large number of cited works of the author. Check out the Public Knowledge Project, which has developed a system for improving the quality of scientific and social research and distributes the journal system and other software to support the publication of scientific sources in open access.
The research literature is freely available on the public Internet, allowing any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, and use them as provided or used data send to the Software for any other lawful purpose without financial, legal or technical impediments other than those inherent in Internet access itself.