The Partition of Bengal and the cultural renaissance: a historical examination of indigenous knowledge in society and literature

Authors

  • MD. Jeaur Rahaman Department of History, Nur Mohammad Smriti Mahavidyalaya, Malancha, West Bengal, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64171/JSRD.4.1.40-45

Keywords:

Cultural renaissance, Indigenous knowledge, Colonialism, Nationalism, Bengali literature, Bengal renaissance, Socio-political discourse

Abstract

In addition to being a political move, the Partition of Bengal in 1905 was a turning point in the intellectual, artistic, and cultural life of colonial India. This study takes a critical look at how the partition affected the cultural renaissance that followed, focused on how nationalist ideas affected indigenous knowledge systems, traditional wisdom, and literary expressions. The study looks at how Bengali society dealt with the split through literature, folklore, and political and social debate, which led to a claim of native identity and intellectual resistance. The paper talks about the important literary figures, reformers, and intellectual groups that helped bring back cultural awareness in response to colonial policies. A lot of attention is paid to how literature, like the works of Rabindranath Tagore and other nationalist writers, helped people fight back and keep their customs alive. This research looks at historical accounts, literary works, and changes in society and culture to argue that the Partition of Bengal led to a deep cultural revival, using indigenous knowledge as a tool of intellectual and political defiance. This study puts the Bengal Renaissance in a bigger picture of history and shows how colonial changes without meaning to helped improve indigenous ways of knowing and cultural autonomy.

References

Angelou M. I know why the caged bird sings. New York: Random House, 1969.

Arendt H. The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958.

Freire P. Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum, 1970.

Habermas J. The theory of communicative action. McCarthy T, translator. Boston: Beacon Press, 1984.

Honneth A. The struggle for recognition: the moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995.

hooks b. Ain’t I a woman: Black women and feminism. Boston: South End Press, 1981.

hooks b. Talking back: thinking feminist, thinking Black. Boston: South End Press, 1989.

Kant I. Grounding for the metaphysics of morals. Ellington JW, translator. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1993. (Originally published 1785).

King ML Jr. Letter from Birmingham Jail. Birmingham (AL), 1963.

Nietzsche F. On the genealogy of morals. Kaufmann W, translator. New York: Vintage, 1967. (Originally published 1887).

Rawls J. A theory of justice. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 1971.

Rousseau JJ. A discourse on inequality. Cranston M, translator. London: Penguin, 1984. (Originally published 1755).

Sen A. The idea of justice. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 2009.

Young IM. Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-24

How to Cite

[1]
J. Rahaman, “The Partition of Bengal and the cultural renaissance: a historical examination of indigenous knowledge in society and literature”, J. Soc. Rev. Dev., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 40–45, Jan. 2025.

Issue

Section

Articles