Construction of the societal development index (case study in Pancoran Mas village, Depok city and Dukuh village, Salatiga city)

Authors

  • Jeffry Raja Hamonangan Sitorus Postgraduate student, Sociology Department, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6532-176X
  • Paulus Wirutomo Professor Emeritus, Sociology Department, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Indera Ratna Irawati Pattinasarany Lecturer, Sociology Department, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1529-2751

Keywords:

development, societal, social structure, culture, social processes

Abstract

Knowing the achievements of development can give an idea of the extent of the efforts that have been made by the government and the community. From a sociological perspective, a measurement tool is needed that can show the level of community development. This research aims to develop a Societal Development Index (SDI) that can measure the level of community development in Depok City and Salatiga City, focusing on the basic elements of community life. The data used were obtained using a mixed method by conducting surveys and in-depth interviews. Exploratory factor analysis was then used to construct the SDI. The research results show that three basic elements of society, namely social structure, culture and social processes, can form the SDI. The SDI score for Depok City was 78.97 and Salatiga City was 81.72. These results show that the quality of community development in Depok City and Salatiga City is in the very good category. In comparison, the SDI of Salatiga City is higher than that of Depok City. Cultural dimensions and social processes contribute significantly to the high SDI of Salatiga City. The three basic elements of society, namely social structure, culture and social processes, make different contributions to the SDI in both Depok City and Salatiga City. In conclusion, SDI can be used to measure and explain the level of community development. Sociologically, SDI can accurately explain the community development that has been implemented by analysing the conditions of social structure, culture and social processes.

References

Azwar S. Reliability and Validity. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 1997.

Bardis PD. Social Interaction and Social Processes. Social Science. 1979;54(3):147-167. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/41886414.

Beall J, Piron LH. DFID Social Exclusion Review. The London School of Economics and Political Science, 2005 May. Retrieved from https://odi.org/en/publications/dfid-social-exclusion-review-2005.

Chen M, Liu W, Tao X. Evolution and assessment on China’s urbanization 1960-2010: Under-urbanization or over-urbanization? Habitat International. 2013;38:25-33. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2012.09.007.

Creswell JW. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications, Inc., 2014.

Hosseini H. Why Development is More Complex Than Growth: Clarifying Some Confusions. Review of Social Economy. 2003 March;61(1):91-110. Taylor & Francis, Ltd. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/29770193.

Institue Setara. Tolerant Cities Index 2020. Pustaka Masyarakat Setara, Jakarta, 2021.

Johnson RA, Wichern DW. Applied Multivariate Stastistical Analysis (Fifth Edition). Prentice-Hall, Inc., 2002.

McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM. Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks. Annual Review of Sociology. 2001;27(2001):415-444. Annual Reviews. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2678628.

Noll HH. Towards a European System of Social Indicators: Theoretical Framework and System Architecture. Social Indicators Research, 2002 Jun, 58(1/3). Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/27527002.

OECD. Handbook On Constructing Composite Indicators, Methodology and User Guide. European Commission, 2008.

OECD. Measuring and Managing Results in Development Co-operation: A review of challenges and practices among DAC members and observers. The Secretary-General of the OECD, 2014 November.

Saha S. Benoy Kumar Sarkar (1887-1949): A Tryst with Destiny. Sociological Bulletin. 2013 January-April;62(1):4-22. Sage Publications, Inc. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/23621023.

Setara Institue for Democracy and Peace. Tolerant Cities Index 2021, Executive Summary, 2022. www.setara-institute.org.

Sharma S. Applied Multivariate Techniques. Wiley & Sons. Inc. United States of America, 1996.

Statistics Indonesia. Crime Statistics 2021. Statistics Indonesia. Jakarta, 2021.

Statistics Indonesia. Official Statistics News: Indonesian Employment Conditions August 2022. Statistics Indonesia. Jakarta, 2022.

UNDP. Human Development Report 1996. Newyork Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.

Wirutomo P. Sociological Imagination: Societal Development. PT Kompas Media Nusantara. Jakarta, 2022.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-17

How to Cite

[1]
J. R. H. . Sitorus, P. Wirutomo, and I. R. I. Pattinasarany, “Construction of the societal development index (case study in Pancoran Mas village, Depok city and Dukuh village, Salatiga city)”, J. Soc. Rev. Dev., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 08–16, Jan. 2024.

Issue

Section

Articles