Participation of rural peoples in the planning process - a case study of hailakandi development block of Southern Assam, India

Authors

Keywords:

rural development, peoples participation, participatory planning exercise, panchayati raj institutions, rural governance

Abstract

Introduction: The 73rd Amendment of the Indian Constitution has given immense power to Panchayati Raj Institution to address various village level economic and social development issues by preparing their plan covering 29 subjects under the 11th schedule of the Indian Constitution in a participatory approach. The state of Assam also adopted the Assam Panchayati Raj Act in the year 1994, and a systematic planning approach has been included in the system through Gaon Panchayat Development Plan (GPDP) from the year 2015-16.

Objective: The main objective of the research work is to identify various issues and problems that are faced by the rural people of the selected region to involve themselves in the planning process in rural areas.

Methodology: Total 140 samples were randomly collected from the Hailakandi Development block of Hailakandi District of Southern Assam and the Ordinary Least Square regression model has been used to study the impact of the selected variables on People’s Participation.

Results: The study find that there is a significant impact of Sex Ratio, Age, Occupational Structure, Family Income, Knowledge, Skills, Attitude, and most importantly Organizational Defects on Peoples Participation. The most important finding is that People with Skills and Positive Attitude restricts themselves to involve in this holistic planning process due to various types of Organization Defects.

Conclusion: The Panchayat Raj System in Assam needs to improve its governance system at the local level by strengthening the quality of Gaon Sabha and the State or Central Government needs to adopt some policies to address the requirements raised by the local people during the planning process with the help of other departments working at village level with some budgetary support.

References

Aziz A (Ed.). Studies in Block Planning. Concept Publishing Company, 1983.

Bagdi GL. Peoples participation in soil and water conservation for sustainable agricultural production in the antisar watershed of Gujarat, 2002.

Bava N. Peoples participation in development administration in India: An empirical study of Tamil Nadu, 1984.

Bhattacharjee PR, Nayak P. Panchayati raj in Assam, 2010.

Borah M, Borah H. Unrolling ‘Amar Gaon, Amar Achoni’-A Study of The Role of Extension Training Centre (ETC), SIPRD, Amoni with Special Reference To The Nagaon District of Assam. Think India Journal, 2019; 22(33):193-203.

Jain PS. Managing for success: lessons from Asian development programs. World Development, 1994; 22(9):1363-1377.

Khan MH, Schäfer HB, Dhanani S. The Development of Rural People: Myths and Approaches [with Comments]. The Pakistan Development Review, 1988; 27(4):379-395.

Nazneen DRZA. Popular participation in local administration: A case study of Bangladesh. Gyan Bitarani, Dhaka, 2004.

Panandiker VP (Ed.). Development administration in India. Delhi: Macmillan, 1974.

Pandey AK. Local Level Planning and Rural Development: An Analytical Study. Mittal Publications, 1990.

Papola TS. Women workers in an Indian urban labour market, 1983; 1914-2017-2041.

Ray DB. A possible framework for understanding and planning campus ministry in a context of change. Princeton Theological Seminary, 1983.

Sharma KL. India: Micro-Studies in Community Development, Panchayati Raj and Cooperation. Ed. By Bishwa Bandhu Chatterjee. Sterling, Delhi, 1969-1970; 10:213.

Siddiquee MNA. Problems of Peoples Participation at the Grass-root: Decentralised Government in Perspective. Journal of Administration and Diplomacy, 1995, 1.

Downloads

Published

2022-10-19

How to Cite

[1]
P. P. Das, “Participation of rural peoples in the planning process - a case study of hailakandi development block of Southern Assam, India”, J. Soc. Rev. Dev., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 32–36, Oct. 2022.

Issue

Section

Articles