Are fiscal incentives enough? Evaluating the effectiveness of Indonesia’s electric vehicle policy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64171/JAES.6.3.84-90

Keywords:

Public policy, Fiscal incentives, Policy network, Tax policy, Electric vehicle, Indonesia

Abstract

Indonesia is at a critical juncture in its transition to Electric Vehicles. Despite a comprehensive fiscal incentive framework enacted through Indonesian Presidential Regulation No. 55 of 2019 and its 2023 amendment, penetration of electric vehicles remains marginal compared to its regional peers, such as Thailand, which is the second largest car market in Southeast Asia. This paper critically evaluates Indonesia’s fiscal incentive policies’ effectiveness for the Electric Vehicles industry through a policy network lens. Drawing on qualitative analysis of primary regulatory instruments, secondary industry data from the Automotive Federation, and prior academic literature, this study maps the multi-actor ecosystem surrounding the fiscal policy on electric vehicles and identifies structural gaps that limit the policy’s impact. Findings reveal that while incentives address both supply (producers) and demand (consumers) sides, their effectiveness is constrained by mass-market price inelasticity, inadequate charging infrastructure, fragmented inter-ministerial coordination, and weak industrial linkages. This study proposes a refined policy network model that integrates stronger actor coordination, targeted demand stimulation, and infrastructure co-investment as prerequisites for a national electric vehicle industry that is commercially viable.

References

Autovista24. Global EV sales reached approximately 17.1 million units in 2024 [Internet], 2026 [cited 2026 Jun 6]. Available from: https://autovista24.autovistagroup.com

Electric Vehicle Association of Thailand (EVAT). Current status of Thailand’s electric vehicles [Internet]. Bangkok: EVAT, 2025 [cited 2026 Jun 6]. Available from: http://www.evat.or.th

Association of Indonesian Motor Vehicle Industries (GAIKINDO). Indonesian automobile industry data [Internet]. Jakarta: GAIKINDO, 2025 [cited 2026 Jun 6]. Available from: https://www.gaikindo.or.id

Detik.com. Jakarta’s air quality ranked among worst globally [Internet]. Jakarta: Detik.com, 2022 [cited 2026 Jun 6]. Available from: https://www.detik.com

Kompas. Jakarta’s air quality is the world’s most polluted city [Internet]. Jakarta: Kompas, 2024 [cited 2026 Jun 6]. Available from: https://www.kompas.com

European Public Health Alliance (EPHA). Electric vehicles and air pollution: the claims and facts [Internet]. Brussels: EPHA, 2022 [cited 2026 Jun 6]. Available from: https://epha.org

Directorate General of Budget, Ministry of Finance. Energy subsidy spending in 2024 will reach IDR 169.5 trillion [Internet]. Jakarta: Ministry of Finance, 2024 [cited 2026 Jun 6]. Available from: https://anggaran.kemenkeu.go.id

United States Geological Survey. Mineral commodity summaries 2024: nickel [Internet]. Reston (VA): USGS, 2024 [cited 2026 Jun 6]. Available from: https://www.usgs.gov

Rhodes RAW. Policy networks. J Theor Polit. 1990;2(3):293-317. doi:10.1177/0951692890002003003.

Klijn EH, Koppenjan J. Governance network theory: past, present and future. Policy Polit. 2012;40(4):587-606. doi:10.1332/030557312X655431.

Sandström A, Carlsson L. The performance of policy networks: the relation between network structure and network performance. Policy Stud J. 2008;36(4):497-524. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00281.x.

Bird RM, Zolt EM. Introduction to tax policy design and development [Internet]. Washington (DC): World Bank, 2003 [cited 2026 Jun 6]. Available from: https://gsdrc.org/document-library/introduction-to-tax-policy-design-and-development/

Klemm A. Causes, benefits, and risks of business tax incentives. Int Tax Public Finance. 2010;17(3):315-336. doi:10.1007/S10797-010-9135-Y.

Easson AJ. Tax incentives for FDI. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2004.

James S. Effectiveness of tax and non-tax incentives and investments: evidence and policy implications. SSRN Electron J, 2014. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2401905.

Brodzka A. Tax incentives in emerging economies. Bus Syst Econ. 2013;3(1):25-36. Available from: https://repository.mruni.eu/handle/007/10539

Trepelkov A, Verdi M. Design and assessment of tax incentives in developing countries [Internet]. New York: CIAT/United Nations, 2018 [cited 2026 Jun 6]. Available from: https://www.ciat.org

Zhang X, Xie J, Rao R, Liang Y. Policy incentives for the adoption of electric vehicles across countries. Sustainability. 2014;6(11):8056-8078. doi:10.3390/su6118056.

Lévay PZ, Drossinos Y, Thiel C. The effect of fiscal incentives on market penetration of electric vehicles: a pairwise comparison of total cost of ownership. Energy Policy. 2017;105:524-533. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.02.054.

Haugneland P, Bu C, Hauge E. The Norwegian EV success continues. In: Proceedings of the EVS29–29th International Electric Vehicle Symposium, 2016, p1-9.

Zhou Y, Wang M, Hao H, Johnson L, Wang H. Plug-in electric vehicle market penetration and incentives: a global review. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change. 2015;20(5):777-795. doi:10.1007/s11027-014-9611-2.

Lieven T. Policy measures to promote electric mobility: a global perspective. Transp Res A Policy Pract. 2015;82:78-93. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2015.09.008.

Malmgren I. Quantifying the societal benefits of electric vehicles. World Electr Veh J. 2016;8(4):996-1007. doi:10.3390/wevj8040996.

Jones LR, Cherry CR, Vu TA, Nguyen QN. The effect of incentives and technology on the adoption of electric motorcycles: a stated choice experiment in Vietnam. Transp Res A Policy Pract. 2013;57:1-11. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2013.09.003.

Van Waarden F. Dimensions and types of policy networks. Eur J Polit Res. 1992;21(1-2):29-52.

Yu H, Wang Y, Yin W, Li D. Policy network analysis of China’s ocean ranching policy: network structure, actors and interaction. Mar Policy. 2022;140:105070. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105070.

Siregar MJ. Housing policy network in Indonesia [dissertation]. Depok: Universitas Indonesia, 2018.

Taufik. Actor network studies in the formulation of public policy. AL-IJTIMA'I Int J Gov Soc Sci. 2017;2:219-234.

ASEAN Automotive Federation. ASEAN automotive federation statistics [Internet], 2024 [cited 2026 Jun 6]. Available from: http://www.asean-autofed.com/statistics.html

ASEAN Secretariat. ASEAN key figures 2024. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat, 2024.

Association of Indonesian Motor Vehicle Industries (GAIKINDO). Indonesian car sales data 2024 [Internet]. Jakarta: GAIKINDO, 2024 [cited 2026 Jun 6]. Available from: https://www.gaikindo.or.id

IDX Channel. Industry actors on Presidential Regulation 55/2019 [Internet]. Jakarta: IDX Channel, 2021 [cited 2026 Jun 6]. Available from: https://www.idxchannel.com

Motorway. How much do electric cars depreciate? [Internet]. London: Motorway, 2024 [cited 2026 Jun 6]. Available from: https://motorway.co.uk

Charlton A. Which electric cars are losing value fastest? Wired [Internet], 2024 [cited 2026 Jun 6]. Available from: https://www.wired.com

Sidabutar VTP. Study of electric vehicle development in Indonesia: prospects and obstacles. J Econ Paradigms. 2020;15(1):21-38. doi:10.22437/paradigma.v15i1.9217.

Vangen S, Hayes JP, Cornforth C. Governing cross-sector, inter-organizational collaborations. Public Manag Rev. 2015;17(9):1237-1260. doi:10.1080/14719037.2014.903658.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-21

How to Cite

Salasa, A. R., Salomo, R. V., & Hardjono, R. K. (2026). Are fiscal incentives enough? Evaluating the effectiveness of Indonesia’s electric vehicle policy. Journal of Advanced Education and Sciences, 6(3), 84–90. https://doi.org/10.64171/JAES.6.3.84-90

Issue

Section

Articles