Constructivism in theory and practice: implications for classroom pedagogy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64171/JAES.6.1.23-29Keywords:
Constructivism, Student-centred learning, Classroom pedagogy, Fiji, Curriculum designAbstract
Constructivism is a learning theory that posits that learners actively construct knowledge through environmental and social interactions, rather than passively receiving information. This paper explores the theory of constructivism, tracing its psychological and pedagogical roots through the work of Jean Piaget, Lev Vygotsky, and Jerome Bruner, and examines its implications for classroom practice. Emphasising a student-centred learning environment, the paper reviews the major principles of constructivism, describes the features of constructivist classrooms, and considers the practical challenges and opportunities of implementing constructivist pedagogy in contemporary school contexts, particularly within the framework of the Fiji National Curriculum Framework (FNCF). While constructivism is widely advocated in policy and theory, a limited synthesis of its theoretical foundations and practical classroom implications remains within Pacific education systems; this paper addresses this gap by contextualising constructivist principles within the Fijian schooling context. The discussion also highlights the alignment between constructivist theory and the demands of twenty-first-century education, offering contextually grounded recommendations for practitioners and researchers.
References
Alam MM. Constructivism and the classroom curriculum. Int J Indian Psychol. 2017;5(1):20-29. doi:10.25215/0501.103.
Allen A. An introduction to constructivism: Its theoretical roots and impact on contemporary education. J Learn Des Leadersh. 2022;1(1):1-11. Available from: https://ldljournal.web.illinois.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Andrew-Allen-Constructivism_JLDL_Vol1Issue1September2022.pdf
Arega NT, Hunde TS. Constructivist instructional approaches: A systematic review of evaluation-based evidence for effectiveness. Rev Educ. 2025;13(1):e70040. doi:10.1002/rev3.70040.
Bada SO. Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. IOSR J Res Method Educ. 2015;5(6):66-70. doi:10.9790/7388-05616670.
Black P, Wiliam D. Assessment and classroom learning. Assess Educ Princ Policy Pract. 1998;5(1):7-74. doi:10.1080/0969595980050102.
Brooks JG, Brooks MG. In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Rev ed. Alexandria (VA): ASCD, 1999.
Bruner J. The culture of education. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 1996.
Bruner JS. The process of education. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 1960.
Chand SP. Exploring the efficacy of constructive alignment in primary classrooms across Fiji [doctoral dissertation]. Suva: University of the South Pacific, 2021.
Chand SP. Teacher’s views on professional learning and development in primary schools in Fiji. Asia Pac Educ Rev. 2024;25:10004. doi:10.1007/s12564-024-10004-3.
Chand SP. Challenges in implementing constructivist approaches: Exploring teachers’ experiences in Fijian primary school classrooms. Aust Educ Res. 2025;52:3631–3655. doi:10.1007/s13384-025-00870-0.
Chen PH, Hong JC, Ye JH, Ho YJ. The role of teachers’ constructivist beliefs in classroom observations: A social cognitive theory perspective. Front Psychol. 2022;13:904181. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.904181.
Dangel JR, Guyton E, McIntyre CB. Constructivist pedagogy in primary classrooms: Learning from teachers and their classrooms. J Early Child Teach Educ. 2004;24(4):237–245. doi:10.1080/1090102040240404.
Daodu M, Elegbede C, Adedotun O. Effectiveness of constructivism theory of learning as 21st century method of teaching. J Adv Psychol. 2024;6(2):1-11. doi:10.47941/japsy.2267.
Darling-Hammond L, Flook L, Cook-Harvey C, Barron B, Osher D. Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Appl Dev Sci. 2020;24(2):97-140. doi:10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791.
Dewey J. Experience and education. New York: Macmillan, 1938.
ELM Learning. Constructivist learning theory [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2026 Jan 7]. Available from: https://elmlearning.com/hub/learning-theories/constructivism/
Flavell JH. The developmental psychology of Jean Piaget. New York: Literary Licensing LLC, 2020.
Fullan M. The new meaning of educational change. 5th ed. New York: Teachers College Press, 2016.
Gray A. Constructivist teaching and learning. SSTA Res Centre Rep, 2019, 97-07. Available from: https://saskschoolboards.ca/wp-content/uploads/97-07.htm
Grier-Reed T, Williams-Wengerd A. Integrating universal design, culturally sustaining practices, and constructivism to advance inclusive pedagogy in the undergraduate classroom. Educ Sci. 2018;8(4):167. doi:10.3390/educsci8040167.
Guskey TR. Professional development and teacher change. Teach Teach. 2002;8(3):381–391. doi:10.1080/135406002100000512.
Kaur G, Kaur R, Rashid A, Ngadni I, Ramasamy R, Balakrishnan K. Generating Piaget- and Vygotsky-grounded parenting strategies: Home-based approaches to enhance cognitive development among young children. Int J Acad Res Prog Educ Dev. 2024;13(3):2030-2043. doi:10.6007/IJARPED/v13-i3/22020.
Kolb D. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Pearson Education, 2015.
Kumar DV, Kumar S, Karamthoti MB, Rao M. Innovative pedagogy and quality concerns in teacher education. New Delhi: Academic Guru Publishing House, 2024.
McLeod S. Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development [Internet], 2024 [cited 2026 Jan 7]. Available from: https://www.simplypsychology.org/zone-of-proximal-development.html
Ministry of Education. Fiji National Curriculum Framework. Suva: Ministry of Education, Fiji, 2013.
Mishra P, Koehler MJ. Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teach Coll Rec. 2006;108(6):1017-1054. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x.
Moluayonge GE, Park I. Effect of challenges with class size, classroom management and availability of instructional resources on science teachers’ teaching practices in secondary schools. J Sci Educ. 2017;41(1):135-151.
Moura A, MacPhail A, Graça A, Batista P. Encouraging students to co-construct and co- and self-regulate their learning within a cooperative learning environment in physical education. J Teach Phys Educ. 2024;43(1):11-20. doi:10.1123/jtpe.2022-0104.
Nabobo-Baba U. Knowing and learning: An indigenous Fijian approach. Suva: Institute of Pacific Studies, University of the South Pacific, 2006. Available from: https://repository.usp.ac.fj/id/eprint/3456
O’Shea J, Leavy AM. Teaching mathematical problem-solving from an emergent constructivist perspective: The experiences of Irish primary teachers. J Math Teach Educ. 2013;16(4):293-318. doi:10.1007/s10857-013-9235-6.
Phillips DC. The good, the bad, and the ugly: The many faces of constructivism. Educ Res. 1995;24(7):5-12. doi:10.3102/0013189X024007005.
Piaget J. Six psychological studies. New York: Vintage Books, 1968.
Piaget J. The equilibration of cognitive structures: The central problem of intellectual development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985.
Rabindran R, Madanagopal D. Piaget’s theory and stages of cognitive development: An overview. Scholars J Appl Med Sci. 2020;8(9):2152–2157. doi:10.36347/sjams.2020.v08i09.034.
Reiser BJ. Why scaffolding should sometimes make tasks more difficult for learners. In: Routledge eBooks. London: Informa, 2023, 255-264. doi:10.4324/9781315045467-37.
Schön DA. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London: Routledge, 2016.
Shah RK. Effective constructivist teaching learning in the classroom. ERIC, 2019. Available from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED598340
Shepard LA. The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educ Res. 2000;29(7):4-14. doi:10.3102/0013189X029007004.
Singh SV, Chand SP. Effects of the examination-driven education system on teachers and students in primary schools in Fiji. Int J Assess Eval. 2022;29(1):57-65. doi:10.18848/2327-7920/CGP/v29i01/57-65.
Thaman KH. Towards cultural democracy in teaching and learning with specific references to Pacific Island nations. Int J Scholarsh Teach Learn, 2009, 3(2). doi:10.20429/ijsotl.2009.030206.
Timperley H, Wilson A, Barrar H, Fung I. Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis iteration. Wellington: Ministry of Education, 2007. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/education/school/48727127.pdf
Voogt J, Fisser P, Pareja Roblin N, Tondeur J, van Braak J. Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A review of the literature. J Comput Assist Learn. 2013;29(2):109-121. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x.
Vygotsky L. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 1978.
Wiggins G. Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1998. Available from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED418997
Wood D, Bruner JS, Ross G. The role of tutoring in problem solving. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1976;17(2):89-100. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x.
Zajda J. Constructivist learning theory and creating effective learning environments. Cham: Springer, 2021.
