Comparative foliar epidermal, chemomicroscopic and physico -chemical evaluation of the leaves of Phyllanthus muellerianus and Phyllanthus fraternus in Zaria, Nigeria

Authors

  • Ajibua MT Department of Botany, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria
  • Iortsuun DN Department of Botany, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria
  • Abubakar BY Department of Botany, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria
  • Ibrahim G Department of Phamacogonosy and Drug Development, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria

Keywords:

epidermal, organoleptic, macroscopic, microscopic', Phyllanthus muellerianus, Phyllanthus fraternus

Abstract

Pharmacognostic assessment was carried out on the foliar epidermal features of the fresh leaves of Phyllanthus muellerianus and Phyllanthus fraternus by examining their organoleptic, macroscopic, and microscopic features. Chemomicroscopic, and physicochemical evaluation of the dry powdered leaves were also carried out, to give quality identification, and also to ascertain the purity of the crude drug. The fresh leaves of the two plants were collected from Samaru, Zaria, in September 2021. The organoleptic and macroscopic characters of the leaves were evaluated by using sense organs to determine their taste, texture, colour and odour. The microscopic examination of anatomical features such as stomatal size, density, index, frequency, types, epidermal cell shapes, vein islet number, and palisade cells were determined. P. muellerianus has a simple leaf while, P. fraternus has bipinnate compound leaf. They both have an elliptical shape, indistinct odour, and bitter taste, P. muellerianus was hypostomatic, P. fraternus was amphistomatic. The stomatal complex type on P. muellerianus was paracytic, stomatal index of 27.69%, while, P. fraternus was anisocytic, stomatal index of 19.86%. Chemomicroscopic examination of the powdered leaves revealed the presence of many components and inclusion. It was concluded that the variation of the stomata features will greatly help in the delimitation, identification, and classification of the two species.

References

Abere AT, Onwukaeme ND. Pharmacognostic Evaluation of the Leaves of Secamone afzelii (Schult) K. Schum (Asclepiadaceae). Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2012;11(1):125-131.

Adedeji O, Jewoola OA. Importance of Leaf Epidermal Characters in the Asteraceaceae Family. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca. 2008;36(2):7- 16.

Adenegan-Alakinde TA, Akinnubi FM. Some Anatomical Features of Basella Linn.: Their Adaptive Significance to Water Stress. Research in Plant Biology. 2015;5(3):14-22.

Balakrishnan M, Dhanapal R, Vamsi ML, Chandra Sekhar KB. Studies on Pharmacognostical Specifications of Azima tetracantha Lam. International Journal of Phytopharmacol. 2010;1:35-42.

Beverley GJ. Differentiation in Plant Epidermal Cells. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2000;51(344):497-505.

Brusotti G, Cesari I, Frassà G, Grisoli P, Dacarro C, Caccialanza G. Antimicrobial Properties of Stem Bark Extracts from Phyllanthus muellerianus (Kuntze) Excell. Journal of Ethnopharmacol. 2011;135:797-800.

Calixto JB, Santos AR, Cechinel FV, Yunes RA. A Review of the Plants of the Genus Phyllanthus: Their Chemistry, Pharmacology, and Therapeutic Potential. Medical Research Review. 1998;18:225-258.

Chanda S. Importance of Pharmacognostic Study of Medicinal Plants: An Overview. Journal of Pharmaconosy and Phytochemistry. 2014;2(5):69-73.

Dineshkumar C. Pharmacognosy can help Minimize Accidental Misuse of Herbal Medicine. Curr Sci. 2007;3:1356-1358.

Elufioye OT, Olaifa AO. Pharmacognostic Evaluation of Spigelia anthelmia Linn (Loganiaceae). European Journal of Medicinal Plants. 2015;8:87-96.

Evans WC. Trease and Evans Pharmocognosy. 16th edition. St. Louis: Elselviers’ Ltd., UK, 2009, 560-562, 568-570.

Kushwah AS, Patil M, Thippeswamy BS. Effect of Phyllanthus fraternus on Fructose Induced Insulin Resistance in Rats. Int. Journal of Pharmacology. 2010;6:624-630.

Obiremi EO, Oladele FA. Water-Conserving Stomatal Systems in Selected Citrus Species. South African Journal of Botany. 2001;67:258-260.

Ogata T, Higuchi H, Mochida S, Matsumoto H, Kato A. HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor from Phyllanthus niruri. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses. 1992;8:1937-1944.

Okoli CO, Ibiam AF, Ezike AC, Akah PA, Okoye TC. Evaluation of Antidiabetic Potentials of Phyllanthus niruri in Alloxan Diabetic Rats. Afr. Journal of Biotechnol. 2010;9:248-259.

Saadu RO, Abdulrahman AA, Oladele FA. African Journal of Plant Science. 2009;3(5):107-112.

Surendra KS, Sheela MA, Deepak HB, Amit A, Chandrasekaran CV. Hepatoprotective Activity of the Phyllanthus Species on Tert-butyl Hydroperoxide (t-BH) – Induced Cytoxicity in HepG2Cells. Pharmacognosy Magazine. 2011;7(27):229-233.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-02

How to Cite

MT, A., DN, I., BY, A., & G, I. (2023). Comparative foliar epidermal, chemomicroscopic and physico -chemical evaluation of the leaves of Phyllanthus muellerianus and Phyllanthus fraternus in Zaria, Nigeria. Journal of Advanced Education and Sciences, 3(5), 01–07. Retrieved from https://dzarc.com/education/article/view/377

Issue

Section

Articles