Factors influencing professional development of teachers of agriculture in public secondary schools in Nyamira County, Kenya
Keywords:
leadership, policies, professional, cost, nyamiraAbstract
Improved teacher professional development will positively impact on teacher competence through improved learner achievement, economic prosperity and eventually global cooperation. This study sought to investigate factors that influence the professional development of teachers of agriculture in public secondary schools in Nyamira County. An exploratory research design was used to taret teachers of Agriculture, Principals and Quality Assurance and Standards officers in Nyamira County. The study employed 167 public secondary schools with 210 teachers of Agriculture. Random sampling was utilized to sample 50 public secondary schools for the study. Simple random sampling was used to sample teachers of Agriculture and Principals while purposive sampling was used to sample Quality Assurance and Standards Officers. Questionnaires were administered to a total of 136 teachers of Agriculture while an interview schedule was administered on 50 Principals and 5 Quality Assurance and Standards officers for collection of primary data. Data collected were subjected to both descriptive and inferential analysis and presented using frequencies, percentages and tables. The study established that that recognition of professional development attained by teachers, provision of sufficient resources and making efficient government policies, availability of professional development opportunities, improvement of school leadership system, provision of sufficient resources/funds, build of better school/academic environment, cost of professional development programmes, recognition of professional development attained are significant factors influencing professional development of teachers of agriculture in public secondary schools in Nyamira county. Thus, stakeholders should identify and address these factors to enhance the professional development of Teachers of Agriculture in this study area and beyond.
References
Barber M, Mourshed M. How the world’s best-performing school systems come out on top, 2017. www.nctq.org/p/publications/docs/mckinsey_education_report.pdf.
Creemers B, Kyriakides L, Antoniou P. Teacher professional development for improving the quality of teaching. Springer, 2013.
Desimone LM. A primer on effective professional development. Phi Delta Kappan. 2016;92(6):68-71.
Elliott K. Teacher performance appraisal: More about Performance or Development? Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 2015, 40(9).
Kathuri NJ, Pals DA. Introduction to educational research, Egerton University, Njoro: Education Materials Centre, 1993.
Lathem SA, Neumann MD, Hayden N. The socially responsible engineer: assessing student attitudes of roles and responsibilities. Journal of Engineering Education. 2011;100(3):444-474.
Mahmoudia F, Özkana Y. Exploring experienced and novice teachers’ perceptions about professional development activities. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015;199:57-64.
Maria M, García I. Informal online communities and networks as a source of teacher professional development: A review. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2016;55:291-307.
Mugenda OM, Mugenda AG. Research Methods: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Nairobi: Acts Press, 1999.
Pillay H, Muttaqi IA, Pant YR, Herath N. Innovative strategies for accelerated human resource development in South Asia: Teacher professional development-Special focus on Bangladesh, Nepal, and Sri Lanka. Manila: ADB, 2017.
Pokhrel TR, Behera SK. Expectations of teachers from teacher's professional development program in Nepal. American Journal of Educational Research. 2016;4(2):190-194.
Wayne AJ, Kwang SY, Pei Z, Stephanie C, Michael SG. Experimenting with teacher professional development: motives and methods. Educational Researcher. 2008;37(8):469-479.
Wedell M. Planning for educational change: putting people and their contexts first. London: Continuum International Publishing Group, 2015.