Challenges of teaching islamic religious education during post-pandemic covid-19 at the State Islamic University of Datokarama Palu, Indonesia

Authors

  • Ramang Ramang Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, Universitas Islam Negeri Palu, Indonesia

Keywords:

post-pandemic, covid-19, face-to-face learning, students behaviour

Abstract

The problem of learning the Islamic religion during the post-covid-19 pandemic is very important to study because it involves changes in learning strategies during the co-19 pandemic to post-pandemic. Even though the pandemic period has passed, it has left a number of challenges for students in facing face-to-face learning. There are a number of studies that have been conducted to discuss the Covid-19 pandemic both for the purposes of fulfilling information for the community and in the field of education. However, research related to the problems of teaching and learning in the post-covid-19 pandemic still needs to be completed. Through a literature review study and intensive field research in the Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training at the State Islamic University of Datokarama Indonesia, this study aims to explain the problems of face-to-face learning after the Covid-19 pandemic. The results of this study indicate that the problems of face-to-face learning after the Covid-19 pandemic have appeared in the face-to-face learning process and have had an unfavorable influence on the behavior of the students to go back to face-to-face lecture mode. The students are reluctant to involve in various face-to-face learning activities such as direct discussions, question and answer, and offline examinations. They used online learning activities which did not require direct interaction. The conclusion is that the problems that occur in learning can be solved by means of lecturers using various strategies in learning, both methods, and strategies. This research still has limitations, namely, focusing on more than one education department within the faculty. In the future, there will be other studies that involve more than one department.

References

Rowan S, et al. Should Student Evaluation of Teaching Play a Significant Role in the Formal Assessment of Dental Faculty? Two Viewpoints. Journal of Dental Education. 2017;81(11):1362-1372.

Sun PC, et al., What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education. 2008;50(4):1183-1202.

Komara E. Curriculum and Civic Education Teaching in Indonesia. Educare: international Journal for Education Studies. 2017;10(1):35-47.

Solheim K, Ertesvåg SK, Dalhaug Berg G. How teachers can improve their classroom interaction with students: New findings from teachers themselves. Journal of Educational Change. 2018;19(4):511-538.

McIntosh R, et al. Observations of Students with Learning Disabilities in General Education Classrooms. Exceptional Children. 1993;60(3):249-261.

Ariani M, Nurdin N. Dampak Pandemi Covid-19 Terhadap Manajemen Penyerapan Anggaran. in Prosiding Kajian Islam dan Integrasi Ilmu di Era Society (KIIIES), 2022.

Nurdin N, et al. E-learning Adoption and Use Hype Cycle during Covid-19 Outbreak (A Longitudinal Survey). IJIE (Indonesian Journal of Informatics Education), 2021;5(2):68-78.

Nurdin N, Nurliana N, Mashuri S. Online Islamic Religious Education Learning During Covid-19 Pandemic International Journal of Contemporary Islamic Education. 2022;4(1):38-52.

Summers JJ, Waigandt A, Whittaker TA. A Comparison of Student Achievement and Satisfaction in an Online Versus a Traditional Face-to-Face Statistics Class. Innovative Higher Education. 2005;29(3):233-250.

Alghamdi A, et al. Online and face-to-face classroom multitasking and academic performance: Moderated mediation with self-efficacy for self-regulated learning and gender. Computers in Human Behavior. 2020;102:214-222.

Ching-Hong L. The comparison of learning effectiveness between traditional face-to-face learning and e-learning among goal-oriented users. in 6th International Conference on Digital Content, Multimedia Technology and its Applications, 2010.

Checa-Morales C, et al. An Organizational Model of Online Learning in the Pandemic Period: Comparison with Traditional Face-to-Face Learning. Education Sciences, 2022;12(7):448.

Desouza KC, Awazu Y. Knowledge management at SMEs: five peculiarities. Journal of Knowledge Management. 2006;10(1):32-43.

Nurdin N, Pettalongi SS, Yusuf K. Knowledge Management Model in Syariah Banking. in 2018 5th International Conference on Information Technology, Computer, and Electrical Engineering (ICITACEE), 2018.

Nurdin N, Yusuf K. Knowledge management lifecycle in Islamic bank: the case of syariah banks in Indonesia. International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies. 2020;11(1):59-80.

Sutton RE. Emotional regulation goals and strategies of teachers. Social Psychology of Education. 2004;7(4):379-398.

Rader LA. Goal Setting for Students and Teachers Six Steps to Success. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas. 2005;78(3):123-126.

Nurfaiqah N, Nurdin N, Alhabsyi F. Management of Al-Qur'an Learning at One Day One Juz Palu Community. in Proceeding of International Conference on Islamic and Interdisciplinary Studies, 2022.

Rahmawati R, Nurdin N, Pettalongi A. Science Learning Methods in Kindergarten Schools (Study at: Khalifah Kindergarten in Palu City 2021). in Proceeding of International Conference on Islamic and Interdisciplinary Studies, 2022.

Haron H, Natrah Aziz NH, Harun A. A Conceptual Model Participatory Engagement Within E-learning Community. Procedia Computer Science. 2017;116:242-250.

Cahill H, et al. Influences on teachers’ use of participatory learning strategies in health education classes. Health Education Journal, 2014;73(6):702-713.

Hakim MAR, et al. An Online English Teaching Module for CCU Subject: A Solution on the Pandemic Covid-19 Situations. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2021;1933(1):012082.

Mayer RE. Learning strategies for making sense out of expository text: The SOI model for guiding three cognitive processes in knowledge construction. Educational Psychology Review.1996;8(4):357-371.

Curry LA, Nembhard IM, Bradley EH. Qualitative and Mixed Methods Provide Unique Contributions to Outcomes Research. Circulation. 2009;119(10):1442-1452.

Creswell JW. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 3 ed. 2014, Los Angeless: sage Publications.

Jokonya O. The Significance of Mixed Methods Research in Information Systems Research. in MWAIS 2016 Proceedings, 2016.

Wright B, Schwager PH. Online Survey Research: Can Response Factors Be Improved? Journal of Internet Commerce. 2008;7(2):253-269.

Braun V, et al. The online survey as a qualitative research tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2021;24(6):641-654.

Nurdin N, Pettalongi SS. Interpretive case study to understand online communication in an e-tendering project implementation. Jurnal Manajemen Komunikasi. 2022;7(1):39-54.

Strauss A, Corbin JM. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques, 2 ed. 1998, California, USA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Rusli R, Hasyim MS, Nurdin N, A New Islamic Knowledge Production and Fatwa Rulings: How Indonesia’s Young Muslim Scholars Interact with Online Sources. Journal of Indonesian Islam. 2021;14(2):499-518.

Nurdin N, Scheepers H, Stockdale R. A social system for sustainable local e-government. Journal of Systems and Information Technology. 2022;24(1):1-31.

Downloads

Published

2023-02-04

How to Cite

Ramang, R. (2023). Challenges of teaching islamic religious education during post-pandemic covid-19 at the State Islamic University of Datokarama Palu, Indonesia. Journal of Advanced Education and Sciences, 3(1), 50–54. Retrieved from https://dzarc.com/education/article/view/259

Issue

Section

Articles