The specificities of ESP (English for Specific Purposes) in a foreign context: a case study of Senegal

Authors

  • Mansour Gueye ELT Abdoulaye SADJI High school, Rufisque, Senegal

Keywords:

approach- communication- english, language- ESP- context

Abstract

English is the leitmotiv language used in international communication and in all the three major sectors (primary, manufacturing and service), private or public. The crucial need for English betokens its spread across the world through ESL and EFL programs. ET pertains to a host of controversial approaches that have fueled the academic debate from educational course designers, teachers and learners, especially in EFL context. English for Specific Purposes (ESP) is subject to many errors and trials regarding the common consensus of a teaching approach. On the one hand, this paper addresses the stakes and advantages of one of the most practical approaches in use of ESP i.e., the Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) approach. On the other hand, it comprehensively studies Senegal as a French instructional language context versus a growing need of English for General Purposes (EGP) and ESP in ESL/EFL context, to say nothing of the effect of “contamination” LV1 springs up in the teaching approach.

References

Basturkmen H. Ideas and options in English for Specific Purposes. London, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2006.

Belcher DD. How Research Space is created in a diverse research world. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2009; 18(4):221-234.

Butler. Teachers’ achievement goal orientation and association with teachers’ help-seeking: Examination of a novel approach to teacher motivation, in Dresel. M. et.al (2013). Relations Between Teachers’ Goals Orientations, Their Instructional Practices and Students’ Motivation, Psychology, 2007; 4(N°7):572-584. (http://www.scirp.org/journal/psych).

Carter D. Some Propositions about ESP. The ESP Journal, 1983; 2:131-137.

Chibi M. The Role of the ESP Practitioner as English Business Teacher. International English Journal and Social Sciences, 2018; 3(2):197-203.

Enesi M, Vrapi F, Trifoni A. Challenging of Teaching and Learning English Language for ESP Courses. Journal of Educational Research, 2021; 11(4):213-226.

Hutchinson T, Waters A. English for Specific Purposes. A Learned Centered Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987, p6, 7, 19. https://doi. org/ 10.1017/ CB O 9780511733031

Javid CZ. English for Specific Purposes: Role of Learners, Teachers and Teaching Methodologies. European Scientific Journal, 2015, 11(N°.20):17-34.

Hymes D. ‘On Communicative Competence’ In J. B. Pride and J. Holmes (eds). Sociolingguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1972.

Loi N° 9192 du 16 Février. JO, 1991; N°5401:107.

Laborda GL, Litzler MF. Current Perspectives in Teaching English for Specific Purposes. ONAMAZEIN, 2017, 38-51.

Mackay R, Mountford A. English for Specific Purposes, eds. London. Longman, 1978.

Mouhamed ASE, Nur HLM. Needs Analysis in English for Academic Purposes, the Case of Teaching Assistants at the University of Khartoum. HOW, 2018; 25(2):49-68.

Nazim M, Hazarika Z. Efficacy of ESP in EFL Context : A Case Study of Saudi Arabia, Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 2017; 8(1):145-164. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol8no1.11

Richars JC. Teachers as Course Developers. Cambridge. CUP, 1996.

Sandor E. Business Teachers’ Perceptions of their Professional Roles in a Hungarian Business School. WoPaLP, 2017, 11.

Downloads

Published

2022-10-01

How to Cite

Gueye, M. (2022). The specificities of ESP (English for Specific Purposes) in a foreign context: a case study of Senegal. Journal of Advanced Education and Sciences, 2(4), 01–05. Retrieved from https://dzarc.com/education/article/view/148

Issue

Section

Articles