Learning versus “No Chalk and No Talk” in modern classroom

Authors

  • R. K. Singh Professor, Education Department, Ganjdundwara College, Ganjdundwara, Kasganj, Uttar Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64171/JAES.5.1.60-63

Keywords:

Chalk and Talk, Active learning, Learner-centred education, Blended learning, Teaching methods, Teacher education

Abstract

The "no chalk and no talk" discussion is just one part in a shift away from the traditional teacher-centred "chalk and talk" teaching towards learner-centred education. This paper reviews the advantages and weaknesses of both methods and concludes that the issue of using or not using any particular method of instruction is of secondary importance and that the main goal of education should be meaningful learning. Traditional classroom teaching has the advantages of systematic explanation, clear teaching, inexpensive teaching and systematic use of methods. It is particularly suitable for subjects that involve logical inference, calculation, drawing and demonstration. But it can overwhelm learners to a point where they become recipients of information and limit questioning, creativity, collaboration and problem-solving. Active learning, on the other hand, encourages questions, discussion, experimentation, projects, peer teaching, reflecting on learning, and the strategic use of digital tools. However, a complete lack of teacher explanation and board instruction could mean that students, especially novices, have no guidance, no scaffolding, and little conceptual understanding. The paper therefore proposes a balanced and blended pedagogical approach where teachers use clear pedagogy and meaningful participation of the students. In this context, the teacher acts as a facilitator and mentor, learning designer, evaluator and professional clarifier and feedback provider. Technology should be used for instruction, not as an instructional tool. Assessment needs to also go beyond a memorization test and assess understanding, application, creativity, cooperation and reflection. The diversity of Indian classrooms, with respect to the size of classes, infrastructure, language, socioeconomic status, and technology access, should be taken into account while considering the teaching practices to be inclusive and resource sensitive. It is not necessary to abandon chalk, teachers' speech or technology for a successful modern education, but it is necessary to use them thoughtfully, actively stimulating the intellectual activity and genuine learning of students.

References

Bonwell CC, Eison JA. Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. George Washington University, 1991.

Bruner JS. The Process of Education. Harvard University Press, 1960.

Dewey J. Experience and Education. Macmillan, 1938.

Evans R. Beyond Chalk and Talk: Engaging Students in the Learning Process. League for Innovation in the Community College, 2000.

Freire P. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Continuum, 1970.

Hooper O, Nardi E, Biza I, Witty G. From ‘chalk and talk’ to active learning: inter-community partnerships and shifts in pedagogical and mathematical discourse. Proceedings of CERME14, 2025, 2253-2260.

Prince M. Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education. 2004;93(3):223-231.

Vygotsky LS. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press, 1978.

Watts M, Becker WE. A little more than chalk and talk: results from a third national survey of teaching methods in undergraduate economics courses. Journal of Economic Education. 2008;39(3):273-286.

Weimer M. Learner-Centered Teaching: Five Key Changes to Practice. Jossey-Bass, 2002.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-10

How to Cite

Singh, R. K. (2025). Learning versus “No Chalk and No Talk” in modern classroom. Journal of Advanced Education and Sciences, 5(1), 60–63. https://doi.org/10.64171/JAES.5.1.60-63

Issue

Section

Articles