The comparative assessment of different fertilizer application on the growth and development of Solanum aethiopicum (Linn)

Authors

  • CN Okereke Department of Botany, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, PMB 5025 Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria
  • CF Iroka Department of Botany, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, PMB 5025 Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria
  • OA Mbaukwu Department of Botany, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, PMB 5025 Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria
  • KE Okereke Department of Botany, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, PMB 5025 Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria
  • CO Agulefoh Department of Botany, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, PMB 5025 Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria

Keywords:

cow dung, poultry excreta, N: P: K, growth, development, Solanum aethiopicum, plant height, leaf area, stem girth

Abstract

A study on the comparative effects of different fertilizers on the growth and development of Solanum aethiopicum was carried out at the teaching and research farm of Ebonyi state university, presco campus. Randomized Complete Block Design was used for the study. The soil samples were treated with N:P:K 15:15:15, poultry excreta, cow dung and no fertilizer (control), the seeds were sown by spraying. Growth parameter such as plant height, leaf area and plant girth were monitored and data collected for 8 weeks. The study revealed that in week one, NPK gave the highest plant height, leaf area and stem girth 23.61±347, 26.86±3.18 and 2.27±0.18 respectively while the control samples had the least all parameters tested. In week two, there was a slight increase in the parameter tested for all treatments but week three and four gave a significant increase, with NPK giving a plant height of 42.05±3.66 (week 3) and 52.61±4.07 (week 4), leaf area 31.78±5.81 (week 3) and 32.63±8.18 (week 4), and stem girth 2.24±0.22 (week 3) and 2.24±0.33 (week 4). Week five showed a slight difference from the values obtained in week four in all treatments. For week six, NPK gave the highest plant height 69.96±5.59; the control gave the highest leaf area 32.42±23.26 while the stem girth had almost the same value for all treatments. The control gave a value of 50.47±7.52 for plant height in week 7 but dropped to 48.60±13.52 in week eight. The leaf area and stem girth showed very slight difference in week 7 and 8. This study revealed that Solanum aethiopicum growth parameters, such as plant height, leaf area and plant girth obtained from NPK fertilizer was also significantly higher than that of cow dung, poultry excreta and control values. Thus NPK 15:15:15 should be used in the cultivation of Solanum aethiopicum for fast growth and development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Nishida C, Uauy R, Rumanyika S, Shetty P. The Joint WHO / FAO Expert Consultation on Diet, Nutritionand the Prevention of Chronic Disease, Process, Product and Policy Implications. Public Health Nutrition, 2004; 7:245-250.

Smith F, Eyzaguirre P. African Leafy Vegetables: Their Role in the World Health Organization’s Global Fruit and Vegetables Initiative. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development, 2007; 7:1-9.

Oyenuga VA, Fetuga BL. Dietary importance of fruits and vegetables. In: Proceeding of 1st National seminar on fruits and vegetables, Ibadan, 1998, 112-131.

Denton O, Afolaji AO. Nigeria most important vegetables and fruits. Macmillan Publishers Ltd, London and Basingstoke, 2000, 249p.

Kogbe JOS. Effects of spacing on the yield of local and exotic species of eggplant. ACTA Horticulturae, 1983; 123:291-297.

Nottidge DO, Ojeniyi SO, Asawalam DO. Comparative effective of plant residues and NPK fertilizer on nutrient status and yield of maize in humid utisol. Nigeria Journal on Soil Sciences, 2005; 15:1-8.

Reijinties C, Hoverkork B, Water-Bayer A. An introduction to low external input and sustainable Agriculture, London, 1992, 340p.

Adepetu JA. Soil and Nigerian food security. Inaugural lectures series 119, Obafemi Awolowo university, Ile-Ife Nigeria, 1997, 19.

Kapkiyai JJ, Karanji KN, Quresh JN, Sruthson P, Woomer PL. Soil organic matter and nutrient dynamic in a kenjan Nitisolunder long term fertilizer and organic input management. Soil Biological Journal of Biochemistry, 1999; 31:1773-1782.

Sharma AR, Mittra BN. Effects of different rates of application of organic and nitrogen fertilizer in rice base growing system. Journal of Agricultural Science, 1991; 117:313-318.

Adeyeye AS, Akanbi WB, Olalekan KK. “The Growth, Yield and seed Quality of Solanum Macrocarpon As Affected By NPK Fertilizer.” Journal of Advanced Studies in Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Sciences, 2014; 1(1):52-57.

Olaniyi JO, Ojetayo AE. The effect of organomineral and inorganic Fertilizers on the growth, fruit yield and quality of pepper (Capsicum frutescence). Journal Animal & Plant Sciences, 2010; 8(3):1070-1076.

Awodun MA. Effect of nitrogen released from rumen digesta and cow dung on soil and leaf nutrient content of “Gboma” (Solanum macrocarpon L.). Journal of Applied Biosciences, 2008; 7:202–206.

Schoberg J, MCNeal B, Baore KJ, June JN. Nitrogen stress effects on growth and nitrogen accumulation by field grown tomatoes. Journal of Agronomy, 2000; 92:152-167.

Warman PR. The effect of fertilizer, chicken manure and dairy manure on timothy yield, tissue composition and soil fertility. Journal of Agricultural Wastes, 1986; 18:289-298.

Duncan J. Composting chicken manure, cooperative extension, king country master Gardener and cooperative Extension livestock Advisor, 2005, 22-25.

Donovan G, Casey F. Soil fertility management in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Bank Technical Paper No. 408. World Bank. Washington, D.C., 1998, 46p.

Ekwealor UK, Iroka FC, Eze NH, Okafor NP. Comparative Effects of Organic and Inorganic Manure on the Growth and Development of Cucumis Sativus. African Journal of Agriculture and Food Science, 2021; 4(3):51-58.

Downloads

Published

2022-03-09

How to Cite

[1]
C. Okereke, C. Iroka, O. Mbaukwu, K. Okereke, and C. Agulefoh, “The comparative assessment of different fertilizer application on the growth and development of Solanum aethiopicum (Linn)”, Int. J. Phytol. Res., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 25–29, Mar. 2022.

Issue

Section

Articles