Causes and consequences of deforestation on rural household income in Aliero Kebbi state
Keywords:
deforestation, questionnaires, income and alieroAbstract
Deforestation is the removal of a forest or stand of trees where the land is thereafter converted to a non-forest use. The aim of this study is to determine the Causes and Consequences of Deforestation on Rural Household Income in Aliero LGA of Kebbi State. The study employed a descriptive and explanatory design; questionnaires were applied in order to collect data. 200 respondents were randomly selected from the study area and these includes; farmers, hunters and members of the general public. The study area was further divided into two groups of A and B and each of the groups contains two villages of which 50 questionnaires were administered to each village. The SPSS (version 22) of the Statistical Regression tools were used to analyze data using a simple percentage which was presented in frequency distribution tables and percentage. The result revealed that, the respondents were gender sensitive (81.5%) were male and (18.5%) were female. Most of the respondents were married (71%) while (100%) of the respondents were Muslims (Islam) indicating that Islam is the dominant religion in the study area. On age, 16 – 25 years (27.5%) recorded the highest number of the respondents in the study area while (44.5%) have low literacy level attaining only non-formal education. Family size 4 and above recorded the highest (61%) of the total population while farming (71%) is the major occupation of the respondents. However, (88%) of the respondents, earn their income from sales of farm/forest produce. Meanwhile on the effect of deforestation on household income, the result shows that age, educational level and source of income are positively significant (6.759, 0.25 and 1.386 respectively) at P<0.05 while gender and family size are negatively significant (-0.547 and -1.004 respectively) at P<0.05. Religion, marital status and occupation are not significantly different (P>0.05). The F- statistics value of 4.590 is significant at P<0.05, while the estimated R-square has the value of 24.355 which means that 24.355% of the variation in the dependent variable is because of the changes in the independent variables. Conclusively, deforestation was identified with the livelihood activities of the respondents in the study area as farming, hunting and sales of forest materials as parts of their major occupation. It is therefore, recommended that government should add more effort on poverty eradication program, and to educate the unemployed members of the community on the dangers associated with deforestation and there is the need for awareness on the effect of deforestation, and government at all level should make alternative cooking fuel(gas) available.
References
Abdullahi YA. Economic Growth and Social Equity in developing Countries, Califonia, Stanford University Press, 1986, 53-65.
Acharya KP, Dangi RB. Case studies on measuring and assessing forest degradation. Forest Degradation in Nepal, Review of Data and Methods, 2009.
Adebayo AA. Federal University of Technology, Yola 8th Inaugural Lecture: Climate: Resource and Resistance to Agriculture, 2010; 48:15-22.
Akinbami J. "An Integrated Strategy for Sustainable Forest-energy-environment Interactions in Nigeria." Journal of Environmental Management, 2003; 69(2):115-28.
Atanda TA. Economic incentives as a tool for reducing deforestation in Egba Division of Ogun State, Nigeria. Journal of Applied Science and Environmental Management, 2018; 22(10):1685-1688.
Barraclough SL, Ghimire KB. Agricultural Expansion and Deforestation: Poverty, International Trade and Land Use. Earthscan, Sterling, Virginia, USA, 2000.
Bulte Erwin H, Joenje Mark, Jansen and Hans GP. "Is there too much or too little natural forest in the Atlantic Zone of Costa Rica?". Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2000; 30(3):495-506. doi:10.1139/x99-225.
Dogondaji SD, Baba KM, Muhammed I. Marketing analysis of Onion in Sokoto and kebbi States of Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural, 2006; 1(2):11-156.
Food and Agriculture Organization. “Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable wood fuels”, in FAO Forestry, Paper 160, Electronic Publishing Policy and Support Branch, Viale Delle Terme di Caracalla, I00100 Rome, Italy, 2009; (5):10-11.
Insaidoo TFG, Ros-Tonen MAF, Hoogenbosch L, Acheampong E. Addressing Forest Degradation and Timber Deficits in Ghana, ETFRN News 53, 2012.
Mahapatra K, Kant S. Tropical Deforestation: A multinomial logistic model and some country-specific policy prescriptions. Journal of Forest Policy and Economics Elsevier, 2005; 7:1-8.
Mallay B. Farmers’ tree management strategies in a changing rural economy and factors influencing decisions on tree growing in Nepal. International Tree Crop Journal, 2000; 10:247-266.
Oluyemi Ayorinde Akintoye, Philip Mfon, Tokunbo Olorundami, Sammy Uka Ukata Taiwo Adesola Akintoye, Glory Mfon. "Challenges of Deforestation in Nigeria and the Millennium Development Goals", 2014.
Osoba AE, Atanda TA, Bola TS. Effect of Deforestation on Rural Household Income in Selected Forest Dependent Commuinities in Odeda Local Council Area of Ogun State, Nigeria. Asian Journal of Research in Agriculture and Forestry, 2019; 3(3):1-10.
Soaga JA, Olorunfemi O, Makinde I. Global economic crisis and market trend in local timber in Ogun State, Nigeria: The climate change advantage. In. Climate variability and change pattern: Impact, science, innovation and policy. Nigerian Meteorological Society 30th annual conference proceedings, 2016.
Soaga JA. Socioeconomic Implications of paradigm shifts in Ogun State Forestry, 2008, p120-138.
Yahaya T, Oladele O, Sifau M, Audu G, Bala J, Shamsudeen A. Characterization and Cytogenotxicity of Birnin kebbi Abattoir Waste water. Journal of Engineering and Scientific Research, 2020; 5:63-70.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Jibrin Naka Keta, Dharmendra Singh, Zom Dama Joefree
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.